Social Media: Crash Course Navigating Digital Information #10

Social Media: Crash Course Navigating Digital Information #10


Hi, I’m John Green, and this is Crash Course: Navigating Digital Information. So we’re going to talk about your social
media feed today, but first: At the beginning of this series, I told you one of the two
jokes I know, and now that we’ve reached the last episode, I’d like to tell you the
other one. So a moth walks into a podiatrist’s office,
and the podiatrist says, “What seems to be the problem, moth?” And the moth answers, “Awww, doc. If only there were only one problem. I can’t hold down a job because I’m not
good at anything. My wife can hardly stand to look at me; we don’t even love each other anymore, worse than that, I can’t even remember if
we ever loved each other. When I look into the eyes of my children, All I see is the same emptiness and despair
that I feel in my own heart, doc.” And then the podiatrist says, “Whoa, moth. Okay. Those are very serious problems, but it seems
like you need to see a psychologist. I’m a podiatrist. What brought you here today?” And the moth says, “Oh. The light was on.” We humans like to think of ourselves as extremely
sophisticated animals. Like moths may fly toward the light, but humans
are endowed with free will. We make choices. Except a lot of the time, we just go where
the light is on. We do whatever feels like the natural thing. We get on facebook because other people are
on facebook. We scroll through posts because the architecture
of the site tells us to scroll. We become passive. In the past decade especially, social media
has fundamentally changed us. Like take your vocabulary, for example. Silicon Valley rivals Shakespeare in its prolific
additions to the English language. Friend, Google, and ‘gram are all verbs
now. Snap and handle have new definitions. Sliding into someone’s DMs is a thing. But it’s not just how we speak — these
apps have not-so-subtly become embedded in our daily lives very quickly. Sometimes we don’t even realize how much
they impact us. They’ve changed our perceptions and expectations
of privacy and they’ve also helped to shape our offline experience. In 2016 for instance, Russian agents organized
political rallies all over the U.S. by creating fake Facebook pages for made-up grassroots
communities that then had real offline rallies. Just by posing as organizers against Donald
Trump or against Hillary Clinton, they actually got real people to show up in Florida, New
York, North Carolina, Washington, and Texas. And those rally-goers didn’t know that it
was a ruse. I find that scary. So today, for our big finale, we’re talking
about the great white whale of navigating online information: your social media feed. INTRO So quick note here at the start. I’m not currently using a bunch of social
media platforms. Which may mean that I’m no longer an expert
in them, but it’s only been six weeks and I don’t think anything has changed that
much. Also, it turns out that whether or not you
participate in Twitter is irrelevant to whether Twitter effects you life because what’s
shared online has offline consequences. Like online shouting matches about politics
can influence how we vote and also how we talk to our extended family at the Thanksgiving
dinner table. Unless you don’t live in the US or Canada
in which case I guess you don’t have Thanksgiving and presumably you never fight with your aunts
and uncles about politics. The way we interact in social media is shaping
all of our offline behaviors, from how we engage with IRL communities to how we consume
goods and services. That’s why there are so many people you
don’t know, and companies and organizations using social media to try to influence your
thoughts and actions. Sometimes those who want to influence you
use false identities like those with the Russian rallies. Sometimes, and more overtly, they buy your
attention with advertising. Some just create really engaging videos about
a kitten saved during a hurricane to steal your attention. Some of these actors have relatively benign
goals and act fairly, like a company sending ads into your feed for a Harry Potter mug
that it turns out you actually want because you are a Hufflepuff and you are proud! But others have terrible motives and spread
disinformation, like hoax news sites which are all run by Slytherins. Still others aren’t quite in either camp. They might unwittingly spread inaccurate information,
or misinformation. Like your aunt who always posts about Onion
articles like they’re actual news. Or me, on the several occasions when I have
failed to pause and laterally read before retweeting news that turned out to be false. The big problem with all of that is that 68%
of U.S. adults get news through some form of social media and nearly half of U.S. adults
get news through Facebook. And across the globe, people between 18 and
29 years old are more likely to get their news from social media than older adults. When we’re this reliant on a media ecosystem
full of pollution, we have to take responsibility for what we read, post and share and to do
that we should fully understand how social media networks really function including the
good stuff, and also the terrible stuff. First, the good side. For one thing, platforms like Facebook, Twitter
and Instagram allow us to share information and thoughts without the help of traditional
gatekeepers. Prior to social media it was really difficult
to have your voice heard in a large public forum. And because all the posts in our feeds look
more or less equal social media has allowed people to have voices in public discourse
who previously would have been silenced by power structures. That’s great! All tweets were created equal and everybody’s
faces look weird with that one square-jawed snapchat filter and we’re all in this together! Also, social media is great for making friends
and finding communities. We can organize ourselves into these little
affinity groups around special interests or organization, which makes communication much
easier than it was before. Like for example, what if a group of people
who want to get together and figure out how decrease overall the worldwide level of suck. Or, when I need to know what is eating my
tomatoes, I can go to a gardening facebook group. That example by the way is for old people
alienated by my previous mention of snapchat filters. That said there are plenty of problems with
social media from cyberbullying to catfishing to scams to massive disinformation campaigns
to people live tweeting shows you wanted to watch later. And if you’re going to live partly inside
these feeds I think it’s really important to understand both the kinds of information
that are likely to be shared with you and the kinds of information you’re incentivised
to share. Let’s start with targeted advertising. So you’re probably seeing an ad in this
corner.. possibly this one. I don’t have a great sense of direction
when I’m inside the feed. Or maybe you watched an ad before this video
played. Regardless, you may have noticed that something
you searched for recently has been advertised to you. Like for instance I’m trying to improve
my collection of vintage cameras for the background and suddenly all I see are advertisements
for vintage cameras. Social media companies make money by selling
advertisements. That’s why you get to use those platforms
for free. But these ads are very different from billboards
or ads in a local newspaper, because these ads were crafted just for you, or people like
you, based on what social media companies know about you. And they know a lot. They can learn your interests and habits based
on how you use their app, but they also track you elsewhere — via other apps associated
with that company, or by using geolocation features to figure out where you physically
are. Social media companies take all that information
and present it to advertisers in one form or another so that those advertisers can target
their ads based on your interests and browsing history and location and age and gender and
much more. Can you protect your privacy and your feeds
from targeted advertising? Kind of. Sometimes. You can check your favorite apps and disable
data and location tracking where you can — these features may fall under Ad Preferences or
Security or Privacy settings. Another potential downside to social media:
how algorithms organize our feeds. So algorithms are sets of rules or operations
a computer follows to complete a task. To put it very simply: social media sites
use what they know about your habits, they combine that with their knowledge of other
people and the things you’ve self-selected to follow, and funnel all that information
through an algorithm. And then the algorithm decides what to show
you in your newsfeed. Generally speaking, a newsfeed algorithm looks
for what you’re most likely to engage with, by liking or sharing it. Social media companies want you to stay engaged
with their app or site for as long as possible. So they show you stuff that you like so you
won’t leave so that they can sell more of your attention. And because the algorithms mostly show us
things we are likely to like and agree with we often find ourselves in so-called filter
bubbles, surrounded by voices we already know we agree with, and often unable to hear from
those we don’t. This also means that most newsfeed algorithms
are skewed toward engagement rather than truth. This is so often the case in fact that entire
businesses have been successfully run on posting engaging, but false, news stories. Many newsfeed algorithms favor outrageous
and emotional content, so companies looking to make money from clicks and advertisements
can use that to their advantage. Hundreds of websites were built on false viral
stories leading up to the 2016 U.S. election, and Buzzfeed later found out many were run
by teenagers in Macedonia. Valuing engagement over quality makes it harder
for users to distinguish between truth and fiction. Like humans tend to interpret information
in a way that matches our pre-existing beliefs. That’s called confirmation bias. But even if you did somehow manage to be completely
emotionally and ideologically neutral on a topic. Research has shown that if there’s information
you know is bogus, encountering it again and again means you might start to believe it. Warding off the negative effects of algorithmic
newsfeeds and filter bubbles is really hard. But I do think you can limit these effects
by A) following people and pages that have different viewpoints and perspectives than
you do, to add some variety to your feed. And B) looking for ways to turn off the “best”
or “top” posts features in your favorite social apps so that they display information
to you in a more neutral way. All of these negative features of social media
combine to create the feature that I personally worry about the most: extreme recommendation
engines. Social media algorithms show you more of what
you’ve already indicated you like. The way we use those apps tends to keep us
surrounded by information we’re primed to believe and agree with. And because engagement is the most important
thing, and we tend to engage with what most outrages, angers, and shocks us. The longer we hang out on some social media
apps and engage with outrageous content the more likely those apps are to push outrageous
content to us. Researchers have found that YouTube’s recommendation algorithms, for instance, consistently showed users more and more extreme, far-right channels
once they began watching political videos. They called it a radical rabbit hole. YouTube was lumping together outlets like
Fox News and the channels of Republican politicians with those of known far-right conspiracy theorists
and white nationalists. They also found that far-left channels have
smaller followings and were not nearly as visible via those same pathways. Now beginning in 2017, YouTube started to
update its algorithm to prioritize what they call “authoritativeness.” In part to try to stop this from happening. But as previously noted, no algorithm is perfect
or objective. Ultimately, it’s on us as users not to fall
down these rabbit holes, not to go merely where the light is on. That’s why I think it’s so important to
follow accounts with differing viewpoints and to turn off data tracking if you can,
and in general to try to unwind the algorithmic web around your social media life. And while you’re in the feed it’s important
to remember to read laterally about sources you don’t recognize. And also take a break once in a while. Talk to actual people. Get some fresh air. I really think that’s valuable. But even though I personally had to leave
lots of the social Internet I do believe that social media can be an effective way to learn
about news and other information–if you’re able to protect yourself. Let’s try this in the Filter Bubble. Oh yeah, that looks about right. Yes, surrounded by everything I love and believe
in. Okay, that’s enough, let’s go to the Thought
Bubble. Okay, so your cousin DMed you a link headlined:
Singing Creek Park Sold, Will Be Home to Monster Truck Rally. Wow. That is your favorite park, so that is a huge
bummer. Your first instinct, of course, is to repost
it with an angry comment like “UGH we need nature WTH this is so unfair.” But wait, no. Take a deep breath and think. Your cousin is kind of a big deal — he’s
Blue-check verified and everything. But blue checkmarks and verified profiles
do not denote truth. They just mean an account itself is who they
claim to be. So you click the link. It’s from a site called localnews.co, which
you’ve never heard of. And this is where your lateral reading kicks
in. Use a search engine to look up the name of
that site. Its Wikipedia entry reveals it’s a recently
founded independent news site for your area, but it’s a very short Wikipedia article
– not many reputable sources have written about the site to give us a better idea of
its perspective or authority. So you search for their claim instead: singing
creek park sale. The first result is that sketchy Local News
site. Let’s peruse the entire page. Ah, there you go — the seventh result is
from a website you do know and trust, your local TV station and they say the park was
sold, but it’s actually going to be turned into a nonprofit wildflower preserve. Which you know what sounds pretty lovely. You could leave it at that. But as a good citizen of the internet, you
should correct this misinformation. Tell your cousin what’s up, they won’t
at all be defensive, ask them not to share it, and then post the
trustworthy article yourself. With the headline, “Condolences to monster
truck enthusiasts.” Mission accomplished. Thanks, Thought Bubble. So during this series we’ve talked a lot
about using lateral reading to check the source, look for authority and perspective, and then
check the claim and its evidence. With social media, a more flexible approach
is probably best. Like sometimes it makes sense to find out
who’s behind the account you’re seeing. Sometimes you should investigate the source
of what they’re sharing. Other times it’s best to evaluate the claim
being made. As you practice you’ll develop a better
idea of how to spend your time online. No matter where you begin, lateral reading
will help you get the information you’re looking for. When in doubt about anything you encounter
online you can challenge your source and your own assumptions and see what others people
have to say. And there’s one last thing I’d add: Be
suspicious of information that confirms your pre-existing worldview, especially stuff that
confirms that people you believe to be evil or stupid are evil or stupid. Read laterally not only when it comes to stuff
you don’t want to be true, but also when it comes to stuff you do want to be true. I know our current information environment
can be frustrating. Believe me, I am frustrated by it. It is really difficult to know where to look
for truth and accuracy, and I wish I could tell you there is one right way, one source
you can always rely upon, but the truth is, anyone who tells you that is selling you an
ideology or a product or both. But by making a habit of following up and
following through, we can be expert navigators of digital information, and maybe even go
to places where the lights are not on. Thanks so much for joining us for Crash Course:
Navigating Digital Information. And thanks to the Poynter Institute and the
Stanford History Education Group for making this series possible. MediaWise is supported by Google. If you’re interested in learning more about
MediaWise and fact-checking, a good place to start is @mediawise on Instagram. Thanks again for watching. Good luck out there in the wild west. And as they say in my hometown, “don’t
forget to be awesome.”

27 comments

  1. I was really hoping you would spend one episode discussing "What IS a 'fact'." Because to majority of millennials a 'fact' is simply something that benefits their claim and everything that doesn't is a 'propaganda'. I spend significant amount of time exploring what the Left Wing and the Right Wing says, and the thing that BOTH keeps saying ALL the time is that the other side is under Dunning Kruger effect and doesn't want to listen to 'Facts'.

  2. This is a great series. I would like to see an addendum though about the problems with accessing information behind paywalls, and also with the EU's horrible copyright thing. I just tried to verify an article laterally and was blocked by no less than 4 paywalls. I don't think I need to say how much this sucks. :/

  3. yea, i still remember the time i decided to click on a bts interview cuz they looked kinda cute and then all i saw on my youtube was bts and now i'm trapped… i'm not complaining tho

  4. "If you're interested in learning more about MediaWise and fact checking, a good place to start is @mediawise on Instagram."

    Uh, what? What have you been saying since the very first episode? I don't think it was "Learn about a company by looking at their social media presence; that'll tell you what you need to know".

  5. Just wanted to chime in to say thanks for making this series. Slowly but surely the information is penetrating: I just added site:.org or site:.edu to a bunch of searches I did about gardening, and the quality of results skyrocketed

  6. I'm sad to point this out but…
    4:19 – citing stats without providing a source,
    9:34 – citing research without providing a source
    These are the kind of things you taught us not to trust in previous videos.

  7. This has been a wonderful series. I would love to see this similar subject introduced to Khan Academy (with these videos integrated). I hope to see another awesome course hosted by John soon!

  8. Love this series.. I learned so much!!! I love watching you and your brother.. other people are good but you two are Great!!

  9. Realizing that confirmation bias is a thing we all have is a huge step in viewing information in a more neutral light, because as bad as fake news is, when you yourself can't be trusted to discern it because of your preconceived notions you become part of the problem…

  10. Thanks for the series and a lot of good advice. However, I refuse to seek out sources that disagree with my worldview. When I'm brought face to face with what 40% of this country believes, I get a tight feeling in my chest and taping a plastic bag over my head starts to look like the only reasonable course of action. I know they are out there — I live in Texas, BELIEVE ME I know they're out there — but please don't ask me to stare them in the face for the sake of accuracy or balance. Don't ask me to balance truth with lies, facts with assertions, tolerance with bigotry, wholesomeness with rot, love with hate, trust with fear. There's got to be another way.

  11. I'm a librarian and instructor in information literacy and this series is great as background for students to think more deeply about what they see/hear/read. The lateral reading is very important. Students are amazed when they are required to evaluate a website and how long it actually takes to find a good one to use in research (one that is credible and less biased). I can't want to refer my students to some of these videos as background on the topics we discuss. Thank you for this series!

  12. Wrong. If your battery is at 17% you should probably save it in case there's an emergency. Turn off Wifi, Data and Bluetooth, put the phone away, and enjoy the beautiful park which will not be turned into a monster truck racing track.

  13. I would like to see a source about that right wing channels could leed you to far right channels, because i have seen research that watching right wing channels would more likely send you to the left and left wing channels to the extreme left.

  14. This one and media literacy should be on the curriculum every human takes before going online. Hot damn!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *